guardian.co.uk on tumblr
  1. Uteruses, how do they work?

    | 157 notes

    It was those great American evangelical poets, the Insane Clown Posse, who asked us once to contemplate the following existential question: “Fucking magnets, how do they work?” But in 2012, after decades of eschewing comprehensive sex education, and lambasting everything from intrauterine devices and birth control pills to emergency contraception, perhaps it’s time to admit that the most existential question of our time for religious conservatives to answer relates to women’s mysterious reproductive tracts.

    So, erm, how do they work?

    Sadly, religious instruction isn’t much help: between telling women that an aspirin between the knees or a phonebook on a man’s lap will prevent pregnancy, it’s perhaps unsurprising that strict adherents to a religion in which a primary article of faith is that a woman was impregnated without the benefit of vaginal penetration or male ejaculate have a few problems fully articulating how modern women can get (or keep from getting) pregnant without a little confusion … or at least elision.

    And so it is that we American women find ourselves being told by legislators in Arizona – those benighted do-gooders behind the anti-Latino “show us your papers” law and the anti-Obama “show us your circumcision” – that, in fact, pregnancy will no longer begin at conception. Instead, we’re told, we’ll soon be legally considered pregnant in the state of Arizona as of the date of our last period, which, as that silly godless “science” tells us, is usually about two weeks before we ovulate. It is true that some medical professionals use a pregnant woman’s last period to estimate a gestational age in the absence of other data – like the actual date of conception which is, when one is not the Virgin Mary, actually not beyond a woman’s capacity to know or recall or a doctor’s capacity to determine. But a legal mandate forcing them to even when other diagnostic tools are more available or appropriate is simply a way to reduce their scientific and professional discretion for the purpose of limiting abortions in ways unimagined by the standards of Roe v Wade and in a manner that is not based on the way women’s supposedly unknowable reproductive tracts work.

    Megan Carpentier takes down the Arizona law pushing for women to be legally considered pregnant as of the date of their last period [read the rest here]

  2. Here’s a new way to stand up to the anti-abortion bullies

    | 41 notes

    Sometimes there’s no obvious way to tackle bullying or harassment. The 40 Days For Life US-based anti-abortion group has set up in the UK, and is picketing abortion clinics across the country. In particular it is targeting a site run by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), which offers family planning counselling to thousands of women a year, and is the UK’s largest independent provider of abortion care.

    Staff and patients at the clinics have complained of intimidation from the protestors, who’ve also been accused of filming staff members and women using the clinic’s services, though the group says those filming were not affiliated with their protest.

    There are legitimate ways to campaign against abortion, but intimidating women outside clinics – deliberately or otherwise – is not one of them.

    But how can such aggressive tactics be stopped? Simply launching a counter-protest outside the clinic in London’s Bedford Square might make things worse: the atmosphere for women trying to use these services in private would become still more charged, and the abortion clinic door risks being legitimised as a place of protest.

    A group of us had a different idea: turning the anti-abortion vigils into a fundraising exercise for BPAS.

    We asked people to donate money for each day the 40 days for Life vigils continue, whether it’s 50p, £1 or £5 per day. The longer the anti-abortionists’ campaign, the more money a worthwhile pro-choice charity receives.

    The response was fantastic, raising £1,000 in just two hours and nearly £2,000 by the end of the first day – all from small donations. Comments from donors were amazing, and touching:

    “Here’s my tiny contribution to say thank you to BPAS, who supported my own difficult decision four years ago,” said one. “I only hope these thugs who so lack in compassion and empathy do not stop the amazing work that BPAS do every day.”

    Another wrote: “The protesters do not have a right to harass these women who are already undergoing a terribly stressful time. Awful conduct.”

    The best reaction, however, came from BPAS staff themselves: “The whole thing has actually reduced some of us to reaching for tissues! I guess it’s a bit novel for people to be so spontaneously generous to us,” BPAS chief executive Ann Furedi wrote on the donation page. “It sends a lovely message to all our staff.”

    There’s more than one way to stand up to a bully.

    • You can donate to the campaign here.

    Photograph: Andrew Winning/Reuters

  3. Photo

    | 439 notes
    [Cartoon: Garry Trudeau]
Newspapers across the US which usually run the Doonesbury comic strip have flat out refused to run his latest, which is about abortion. Others have decided to move him to the op-eds section instead.
Cartoonist Garry Trudeau “expressed dismay over the papers’ decision but was unrepentant, describing as ‘appalling’ and ‘insane’ Republican state moves on women’s healthcare.” The Guardian will be running him as usual.
But how truly bad is the ongoing onslaught on women’s reproductive rights? Here’s a round up of our recent op-eds on the issue to give you more context:
• Rush Limbaugh, you elite liberal feminist! | by NPR On the Media’s Bob Garfield
• Why anti-choice campaigners won’t let science get in their way | by feminist blogger Amanda Marcotte
• The Republican party declares war on women | by broadcaster Diane Roberts
• Virginia’s vagina-violating ultrasound law | by Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead
• Sex, Rick Santorum and the conservative imagination | by Guardian blogger Ana Marie Cox

    [Cartoon: Garry Trudeau]

    Newspapers across the US which usually run the Doonesbury comic strip have flat out refused to run his latest, which is about abortion. Others have decided to move him to the op-eds section instead.

    Cartoonist Garry Trudeau “expressed dismay over the papers’ decision but was unrepentant, describing as ‘appalling’ and ‘insane’ Republican state moves on women’s healthcare.” The Guardian will be running him as usual.

    But how truly bad is the ongoing onslaught on women’s reproductive rights? Here’s a round up of our recent op-eds on the issue to give you more context:

    Rush Limbaugh, you elite liberal feminist! | by NPR On the Media’s Bob Garfield

    Why anti-choice campaigners won’t let science get in their way | by feminist blogger Amanda Marcotte

    The Republican party declares war on women | by broadcaster Diane Roberts


    Virginia’s vagina-violating ultrasound law | by Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead

    Sex, Rick Santorum and the conservative imagination | by Guardian blogger Ana Marie Cox

  4. Gallery

    | 19 notes

    Abortion rights: what’s wrong with these pictures?

    Women are missing from those two - now (in)famous - pictures showing politicians/experts taking action on women’s reproductive rights. If you are an religious woman (pro- or anti-choice), what are your thoughts on this lack of inclusion – do you trust your spiritual leaders to make the right choice with enough empathy, or do you worry that without first-hand experience, they might not be able to advocate for women as well as female experts could? - jess

    Left photograph: White House/public domain; right photograph: Benjamin Meyers/Corbis

  5. Photo

    | 35 notes
    I lifted the screenshot + tweet from @jessicavalenti and @LisaMcIntire’s twitter feeds - but I do have a question to go with it:

In case you missed it: Komen VP retweeted (then deleted) message saying “pro-abortion” groups should “cry me a river”

What I don’t get: why did she delete the tweet, if that’s her line? Or perhaps more to the point - who advised her to delete it? - jess

    I lifted the screenshot + tweet from @jessicavalenti and @LisaMcIntire’s twitter feeds - but I do have a question to go with it:

    In case you missed it: Komen VP retweeted (then deleted) message saying “pro-abortion” groups should “cry me a river”

    What I don’t get: why did she delete the tweet, if that’s her line? Or perhaps more to the point - who advised her to delete it? - jess

  6. Quote

    | 18 notes

    It was personal for me. At 17, I found myself pregnant and alone; and after going to anti-choice zealots for guidance, I found only scorn and shame. It was Planned Parenthood that listened to me, which allowed me to make the choice I needed to make, which was to have an abortion.

    I wanted to give back, so together with my friend Maggie, we formed a two-woman fundraising machine, reached out to Planned Parenthood and organized a tour to raise money and awareness for local affiliates. I piled my two dogs in a van (…)

    I did 16 fundraisers between April and December, bringing my comedy act into towns doing shows to raise money and share my story with hundreds of people each night who also wanted to preserve the quality care Planned Parenthood provides.

    A lot of people shared their stories with me. People who had similar experience to mine and kept it a secret. Wonderful stories of appreciation for quality prenatal care they received, and equally appreciative stories of being able to have a safe haven where they could make that very personal decision to terminate a pregnancy.

    I heard stories, too, from women and men whose lives were saved because they were able to get all kinds of cancer screenings; from cervical to testicular to thyroid. And many stories of breast cancer detection.

    Lizz Winstead, co creator of The Daily Show, on the Susan G Komen Foundation defunding Planned Parenthood. Read the entire piece here.
  7. Quote

    | 7 notes

    The three minutes in question are a clip from Morgan’s interview with Santorum on the former’s CNN talk show. In it, Santorum declares that even if his own daughter were raped – a hypothetical scenario both men manage to discuss with remarkable calm – the Roman Catholic presidential candidate would maintain his adamantly pro-life position regarding abortion.

    I sincerely feel a tiny, grudging mote of respect for that degree of consistency. As anti-choice zealots go, those who will take the “baby killer” argument to its extreme appeal to me slightly more than those who can say with a straight face that abortion is murder, except when the woman didn’t want to have sex.

    Kate Harding on Rick Santorum’s “pregnancy through rape is God’s gift” line

About

We like opinions. Quotes, photos, cartoons, video and audio content (plus reblogs) from Comment is free, the Guardian op-eds desk. Curated by @guardianjessica, @bellamackie and @oliverlaughland. Get in touch: cif.editors@guardian.co.uk

People we follow

Stuff we like

Follow Guardian comment on Twitter