Quote
| 6 notes
Reddit’s mods aren’t boycotting a site they dislike: they’re imposing a ban against it on millions of users. They haven’t reluctantly imposed censorship to comply with national law, or even with Reddit’s own policies (the site is vehemently against trying to “out” users’ real identities). Instead, they’ve issued retaliatory bans against a writer, and his outlet, because they don’t like what he is saying.
Reddit’s new stance appears to be that free speech is great – as long it’s speech it agrees with. Which is a position the RIAA (which seeks to close sites linking to pirate content), or even China’s Communist party could happily agree with.
James Ball: Reddit wants free speech – as long as it agrees with the speaker
-
dalcrose likes this
-
audrey139 likes this
-
missgingerlee likes this
-
nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident reblogged this from guardiancomment
-
nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident likes this
-
timtumble reblogged this from guardiancomment
-
guardiancomment posted this